A year of GDPR

On Saturday, 25 May 2019, exactly one year has passed since the entry into force of the General Data Protection Act (GDPR), which was marked as the biggest change in the field of personal data protection for decades and has become a global reference point.

Some companies processing personal data in the course of their business activities have harmonized their business with the provisions of the GDPR, wherein it is in the interest of others to do. Media reported in particular of fines imposed by the supervisory authorities abroad. One of the first high-profile cases was the EUR 400,000 fine imposed on a hospital in Portugal. On 21 January 2019, the French Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) imposed on Google a fine of EUR 50 million. In the past year, the Slovenian Information Commissioner was mainly concerned with issuing opinions.

The Ministry of Justice announced the adoption of the Personal Data Protection Act (ZVOP-2) complying with GDPR in the summer of 2019. Following the adoption of the ZVOP-2, a more active role in imposing fines for violators is expected by the Information Commissioner. Efforts to harmonize their business with the provisions of GDPR should, therefore, be the priority of each controller and processor who has not yet done so.

RELATED POSTS
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE REGARDING THE ACT ON JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF FORMER HOLDERS OF ELIGIBLE LIABILITIES

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE REGARDING THE ACT ON JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF FORMER HOLDERS OF ELIGIBLE LIABILITIES

With the adoption of the Act on Judicial Protection Procedure for Former Holders of Eligible Liabilities of Banks (Act on…

Read more
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU DIRECTIVE ON WORK-LIFE BALANCE

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU DIRECTIVE ON WORK-LIFE BALANCE

The Directive (EU) 2019/1158 on work-life balance for parents and carers came into effect in August of this year. It…

Read more
Withdrawal from case-law on the publicity effect of entries in the land register in light of the starting point of the subjective limitation period for a damages claim

Withdrawal from case-law on the publicity effect of entries in the land register in light of the starting point of the subjective limitation period for a damages claim

In Case No III Ips 38/2021, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia has mitigated its jurisprudence on the…

Read more

Address:

Dalmatinova ulica 2
SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Phone:

+386 59 097 400
+386 59 097 410

Email:

info@s-k.law

Social: